국제법 판례 · 통상법 해설 포털
- 분류 전체보기 (540)
- 통상법무정책 (51)
- 통상분쟁 판례해설 (144)
- 투자분쟁 판례해설 (176)
- 국제분쟁 판례해설 (150)
- 통상·투자 해설강의 (14)
- 학술행사 발표영상 (5)
* 아래 본문은 원문과 문단 구분 등이 다를 수 있습니다. 정확한 원문을 확인하시고 싶으신 분은 위 파일을 다운로드하시기 바랍니다.
The crisis of the multilateral system has been raised for a long time. In particular, uncertaintiessurrounding the global trade environment are increasing such as the US-China dispute andreorganization of supply chains.
Unfortunately, the restoration of the 1995 WTO system based on multilateralism is not likely tohappen in a foreseeable future. Economic powerhouses such as the U.S. and China are not hesitantto use trade policies as a tool to maximize their national interests. Against the backdrop of increasinguncertainty, non-market values such as climate change and human rights have begun to be mergedwith international trade. A new type of trade regime centered on countries or regions is being formed.
Two concrete measures embodied with the value-oriented trade policies are the EU's Carbon BorderAdjustment System(CBAM) and the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act(IRA). Although it is a bit far-fetchedto compare both on the equal footing due to their structural difference, both ultimately have a commonpoint in establishing the foundation of value-oriented trade regime. The advocates of both CBAM andIRA put forth the protection of universal values such as the environment, human rights, and democracyas a means to justify their deviation from multilateral protocols. Nevertheless, both run the risk of beingexploited as a tool for their national interest. Since both can be abused as a disguised restriction oninternational trade prohibited under the multilateralism, it is very important to accurately diagnose theirpotential ramifications.
This paper will review the policy and legal issues of both measures and examine their compatibilitywith the WTO rules from a multilateral perspective. Based on the analysis, policy proposal for bothgovernment and private sector will also be reviewed.
Keywords : Value-oriented trade regime, Multilateralism, GATT/WTO, CBAM, IRA, Protectionism,Distortion of competiton
|본 저작물 사용 시 저작물의 출처를 표시하셔야 하며,
상업적인 이용 및 변경은 금지됩니다. 위 조건을 위반할 경우 저작권 침해가
성립되므로 형사상, 민사상 책임을 부담 하실 수 있습니다.
상세한 안내는 링크 참조하시기 바랍니다.
|8. (부록) (세종 국제통상법센터) Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (WT/DS512) (0)||2023.01.13|
|7. (부록) (김성중) Dominican Republic-Safeguard Measures on Imports of Polypropylene Bags and Tubular Fabric (WT/DS415, 416, 417, 418/R) (0)||2023.01.13|
|5. (권소담, 강혜인, 이정민) EU 신(新)통상규범 연구: 역외보조금 규제·통상위협대응조치를 중심으로 (0)||2023.01.13|
|4. (최원엽) Legal Impediments to the Exercise of WTO Jurisdiction in light of Mexico -Soft Drinks (DS308) and Peru-Agricultural Products (DS457) (0)||2023.01.13|
|3. (김수동) IPEF 협상의 필러별 주요 의제와 세부 조항 검토 (0)||2023.01.13|